IT/Clustered Nextcloud: Difference between revisions

From msgwiki
< IT
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:50, 15 May 2024

Why?

  • more robust, a server can go down and Nextcloud still runs (depending on implementation)

Why not?

  • needs more hardware (at least 3 nodes for e.g. Galera)
  • more complex

Upgrade Paths

  • Distributed DB
    • MariaDB clustered with Galera
    • it was only recommended to use only 1 DB node for writes with all instances (Galera does not support WRITE_COMMIT which Nextcloud depends on)
      • that may have changed since, but there seems to be no public documentation for clustering for newer versions (since this is probably more for enterprise customers)
    • read can be done from all DB nodes
  • Distributed FS
    • GlusterFS
    • Ceph
    • ...
    • Alternatively just shared filestorage e.g. NFS
    • Alternatively SyncThing (maybe more for a Active-Failover Setup with high latency inbetween?)
  • Load Balancer/Failover
    • HAProxy
    • Keepalived

Ressources